Some believe it's a matter of integrity and accountability; others believe this will start the healing process. In addition to public demands, one Michigan State trustee says it's time for the university president to resign over Dr. Lawrence G. Nassar's sexual abuse of dozens of female athletes.

With calls from lawmakers, newspapers, survivors and the public mounting for the resignation of Michigan State University President Lou Anna K Simon due to information revealed in the investigation of ex-Dr. Larry Nassar, the MSU Board of Trustees emerged from a long closed-door meeting on Friday, January 19 to voice their continued support for Simon.

The rest of the university trustees have shown public support for the president, Lou Anna Simon. In a statement, they said, "President Simon is the right leader for the university, and she has our support." But the sole trustee, Mitch Lyons, disagrees:

“I don’t feel that President Simon can survive the public outcry that has been generated by this tragedy. I feel that our best recourse is for President Simon to resign immediately in order to allow the healing process to begin."

According to a Detriot News story, several university officials, including the president, heard complaints about Nassar. Simons admits, “I was informed that a sports medicine doctor was under investigation. I told people to play it straight up, and I did not receive a copy of the report. That’s the truth.” People question her judgment in not seeing the final report, particularly given the recent explosive case at Penn State University. We will see what happens next.

Image source.

Discussion:

  • Should Simon resign? Why or why not?
  • What does it take for Lyons to break rank with the rest of the trustees? How would you describe the possible dynamics on the board?
  • How does such abuse go on for so long? About 140 women complained about Nassar when he was working with Olympic athletes, and at least eight students came forward at the Michigan State.
  • At the end of the trustees' statement, a reporter asks, "Why no questions?" But the board leaves the room without saying anything. Should they have taken questions? Why or why not?
Previous
Previous

How Well Can People Rate News "Credibility"?

Next
Next

Sonic Restaurant Tailors Communication